Active support of an idea or cause etc.; especially the act of pleading or arguing for something!

Daily Archives: October 2, 2012

Here is the link to changes being made by the State School Board  The following are the ones that are of the great est concern, especially those in yellow highlights.

The definition below of student information opens up a huge can  of worms or in legal terms a loophole.

34 G. “Student information” means materials, information,


35 records and knowledge that an LEA possesses or maintains, or

36 both, about individual students. Student information is

37 broader than student records and may include information or

38 knowledge that school employees possess or learn in the course

39 of their duties.

40 [D]G. “Student record” means a record in any form,

41 including handwriting, print, computer media, video or audio

42 tape, film, microfilm, and microfiche, that is directly

43 related to a student and maintained by an educational agency

44 or institution or by a party acting for an agency or

45 institution. Student records shall be maintained by LEAs

46 consistent with 20 U.S.C. Section 1232g.

We are getting back emails from the State School Board saying that they had to do this because of legislation.  We need to let Kour legislators know that this legislation passed is now affecting privacy.

Specifically, Utah Futures bill which collects and shares data all over the place.  Here is the link to that bill.  Line 79 includes behavior  There are other bills as well that call for the sharing of data.

Thank you for your email. It appears that there has been some misunderstanding regarding possible action to be taken by the State Board of Education this Friday. The Board is not looking at any changes to FERPA – we do not have the power or authority to change FERPA law.

The Board members I’ve spoken with feel strongly about protecting students’ privacy. Unfortunately, the Legislature has passed legislation requiring classroom level student performance data be made public. As is always the case with bills passed by the Legislature, the State Board of Education is required to make “rules” that conform to the Legislature’s intent. The rule we are reviewing on Friday is our attempt to comply with legislation (as we are required to do) while still protecting student data. If you take the time to read through the rule I believe you’ll find we are earnest in the desire to protect students’ privacy.

If you have concerns about releasing student data, I would recommend that you contact your legislator.



Tami Pyfer

Pearson Publishing Stands to make millions of dollars off of our children’s education. In fact, they have already been making millions of dollars. I believe there is a place for business in education, however, when secret combinations come together to high-jack education we need to seriously reconsider funding them at all.

Sir Michael Barber is the Chief Education Advisor at Pearson PLC. He’s an outspoken Common Core and global common standards promoter. I’ve watched his speeches on YouTube this week and have attached links to these seminars and interviews below.

While some on the Utah State School Board have said that “Utah can get out of Common Core anytime we like,” Sir Michael Barber emphasizes an aim of “irreversible reform.”

“If you want irreversible reforms, work on the culture and the minds of teachers and parents,” Barber says.

He says this is important to avoid parents or traditionalists who might repeal progressive reforms because of a “wish for the past.”

He defines “sustainable reform” as “irreversible reform” and aims to “make it so it can never go back to how it was before.” I find this creepy.

At last month’s British Education Summit, Barber gave a speech entitled “Whole System Revolution” in which he taught principles from his book, “Deliverology 101″.

John Seddon, British management guru and president of Vanguard, has a series entitled “Why Deliverology Made Things Worse in the UK.” (“Deliverology 101,” Barber’s book, was written specifically for American education reform.)

“I don’t go around the world bashing Deliverology, but I think I should,” said Seddon, who defines Barber’s “deliverology” as “a top-down method by which you undermine achievement of purpose and demoralize people.”

Seddon says “deliverology” imposes arbitrary targets that damage morale.

But in Barber’s view, top-down education reform is necessary, a “global phenomenon,” no longer to be managed by individuals or sovereign countries; education reform has “no more frontiers, no more barriers,” he said at the August summit on education.

Barber showed a chart during his summit speech, displayed at 12:06 minutes, which he calls a goal of “whole system revolution,” pinpointed as the sum of the following addends: systemic innovation + sameness of standards + structure + human capital.

Sir Michael Barber said: “We want data about how people are doing. We want every child on the agenda.” (6:05) He specifies that “every child” means every “global citizen.”

In another clip, Barber praises Common Core (CC) at a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) interview.

In yet another interview –also with the CFR– Barber says, “Can I congratulate the CFR for getting into this issue? I think it’s great to see education as an issue of national security and foreign policy as well as economic and domestic policy.”

But as we all know, under the U.S. Constitution, education in the U.S. is to be state-led, not a federal or internationally-determined, issue.

Then there’s the BBC interview.

In this clip, on the BBC show Hardtalk, Barber outlines the benefits of “private and public partnership.”

Pearson “invests,” says Barber, by purchasing cheap schools in developing countries in partnership with governments.

Pearson works hand in hand with both nongovernmental agencies (NGA and CCSSO) and with governmental agencies (U.S. Department of Education) to promote global education and Common Core. Because he sees global control of education and U.S. Common Core as one and the same.

Evidence of the push toward ultimate loss of control over local education? Look at 6:05 on–the August Summit speech.

Barber says that every person in every country should have exactly the same definitionof what it “means to be good at maths”.

At 4:00 he says that “citizens of the world” including every single child, “all 9 billion people who will be alive in 2050″ must know E(K+T+L) –which stands for (Knowledge + Thinking + Leadership) multiplied by “ethical underpinnings.”

Then Barber explains that the “ethical underpinning” is “shared understanding” of earth and “sustainability” that every child in every school around the world will learn. Ethics, to Barber, have nothing to do with individual liberty, the Constitution, or the Golden Rule. It’s about the global collective.

Pearson is very successful in selling Common Core curriculum, online assessments, teacher professional development, and technological resources nationwide.

Common Core is very big business. The Wall Street Journal quotes Pearson’s CEO on Common Core as a financial goldmine:

“‘It’s a really big deal,’ says Peter Cohen, CEO of Pearson’s K-12 division, Pearson School. ‘The Common Core standards are affecting literally every part of the business we’re involved in.’”

When the BBC interviewer accused Sir Barber of leading Pearson to take over nations’ sovereign educational systems, Barber said, as a defense, “I worked for government. I love government. I think government is a really important, a big part of the solution.”

Advising governments from the U.S. to Pakistan on how to implement nationalized education is Barber/Pearson’s specialty.

As the UK Guardian writes:

“…Barber and his graphs have gone global. As McKinsey’s hubristically titled “head of global education practice”, he has set up a US Education Delivery Unit (albeit as a private sector rather than government venture), co-authored books that claim to identify what makes national education systems successful, and taken the joint chairmanship of a taskforce in Pakistan to establish “national standards” in basic subjects. Now he’s becoming chief education adviser to Pearson, owner of Penguin Books and the Financial Times and also, in its own description, “the world’s leading learning company“, with interests in 70 countries…”

Pearson has long been partnered with Achieve Inc., which is alarming because Achieve, Inc. happens to be a co-author of Barber’s “Deliverology 101″ andAchieve also happens to partner “with NGA and CCSSO on the [Common Core] Initiative, and a number of Achieve staff and consultants served on the [Common Core] writing and review teams,” in Achieve’s own words.

These incestuous combinations of NGOs, the Pearson company, and the Federal Government, appear to literally be taking over educational decision-making.

I want to thank Christel Swasey for her in depth research and for the time it took her to put the info in  concise and easy to read manner.


Most Pearson consumer publishing is done by the Penguin Group, which includes international imprints such as Allen Lane, Avery, Berkley Books, Dial, Dutton, Dorling Kindersley, Grosset & Dunlap, Hamish Hamilton, Ladybird, Plume, Puffin, Penguin, Putnam, Michael Joseph, Riverhead, Rough Guides, and Viking.